Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy 6
Four boxes, 324 pounds, and a $19,900 price of admission. This was the version that traded the lab coat for a dinner jacket.
Overview
The WATT/Puppy 6 is a four-piece loudspeaker system - a pair of WATT monitors sitting on a pair of Puppy woofer cabinets - that sold for $19,900 as a complete system. Broken out, the WATT 6 ran $9,300 per pair and the Puppy 6 $10,600 per pair. Stacked up, it stands 40 inches tall on a footprint just 12 inches wide and 18½ inches deep, and weighs 324 pounds total: roughly 65 pounds per WATT, 97 per Puppy. That is a lot of speaker in a very small column.
The drivers carried over from the previous generation: a 1-inch inverted titanium dome tweeter and a 7-inch polymer cone in each WATT, plus two 8-inch polymer woofers in each Puppy. What changed was everything around them. The Puppy 6 cabinet grew slightly larger - you'd only catch it by parking a 6 next to a 5.1 - and that extra volume let Wilson rate the system's frequency response down to 23 Hz, ±3 dB, on the same drivers. Nominal impedance is 4 ohms, sensitivity is a claimed 92 dB at 1 watt/1 meter, and the recommended minimum amplifier power is 7 watts per channel. That last figure isn't a typo. A single-ended triode can wake this system up, even if most buyers fed it far more.
The enclosure work is where the 6 earns its keep. Wilson introduced new cabinet materials first developed for its MAXX model, and the company claimed these cut the old Puppy's cabinet resonance roughly in half. A new bottom plate in the WATT, made of what Wilson called "enhanced" materials, damps the cabinet and also provides service access to the crossover. The binding posts were redesigned in-house. The company claimed improved evenness at the crossover frequencies, and reviewers who had wrestled with the previous WBT terminals welcomed the change on ergonomic grounds alone.
Then there's Phase Delay Correction, or PDC. It's an enclosure-positioning scheme in which the WATT tilts atop the Puppy on alignment spikes and a decoupling plate to improve time coherence. PDC had already appeared in Wilson's MAXX, WAMM, and SLAMM models, and here it gives owners real flexibility in tuning the system to a room. The catch is that setup is fussy to the millimeter. The recommendation is to mark the floor and record the tilt angle before you ever move the speakers. A lip on the Puppy's top surface now traps the WATT in place, and a massive spike at the rear locks it down further. That was a direct fix for the so-called "Wilson WATT shuffle," the mystery drift owners of earlier versions knew all too well.
Cosmetics moved upmarket too. Every WATT/Puppy 6 shipped in gloss finish, which had been an option on earlier systems whose standard finish was laminate. Wilson also offered some bold colors, including metallic burgundy, forest green, and a champagne-bronze among the better-looking ones. A cloth grille on a rigid frame made from X-1 material became available for buyers who couldn't stomach the reticulated foam, though David Wilson himself reportedly maintained the foam sounded better.
The name has some history behind it. The WATT - Wilson Audio Tiny Tot - began as a one-off near-field monitor for David Wilson's personal use while he was overseeing recordings for his own label. Word spread through the high-end community, friends and colleagues pushed him to productionize it, and he relented, launching the WATT at the January 1986 Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas. It was a studio tool first: unforgiving, transparent, detailed, and bass-shy despite a bolt-on baffle extension nicknamed the "beard." Demand for bottom end brought the Puppy subwoofer at CES 1988, and the WATT/Puppy pairing became a high-end reference. Through the earlier versions, Wilson offered nominal-fee upgrades - crossover refinements, improved drivers, often fitted in the field. By the 5.1 the enclosure changes forced factory work, and with the 6 the changes were extensive enough that older WATTs and Puppies simply could not be converted. Audio (January 2000, p.77) traced that lineage and noted the company had kept the upgrade path running for roughly a dozen years rather than milking the replacement market.
The period press was unusually unanimous on the sound. Audio (January 2000, p.83) reported that the 6's hyper-crisp character had given way to a silkiness bordering on the lewd, and that the "hot seat" - the narrow sweet spot the line was famous for - had actually grown larger. The same review observed that the system stayed composed whether driven by 300 watts or by a single 845 tube, and singled out its extended, fast, chunky bass as the defining asset. Audio (January 2000, p.80) also noted that every WATT/Puppy revision had brought a larger sweet spot, a sweeter top end, and a less aggressive presentation, with the 6 furthest along that road. The reviewer's summary: nicer, easier to use, and more domestically acceptable in every way, though hardly a threat to the slender electrostatics of the day in the looks department. The small footprint is not an invitation to a small room. The system reportedly wants at least three feet of space to its sides and behind it.
eBay Listings
As an eBay Partner, we earn from qualifying purchases. This helps support our independent vintage technology research.